Logan D. A. Williams
  • Home
    • Contact Logan
  • Logan's Blog
  • Consultancy Services
    • Ex Logan Williams Curriculum Vitae
  • Research
    • Research Projects
    • Publication Repository
    • Photovoice Project >
      • Photovoice Project - North Carolina
    • Research Assistants >
      • Publications and Presentations with RAs
  • Teaching
  • Knowledge from the Margins

My thoughts on the academic job search for recent PhD's in Science and Technology Studies

29/5/2012

6 Comments

 
I just read chapter 3 of Kyle Siler's dissertation, entitled “Nascent Institutional Strategy in Dynamic Fields: The Diffusion of Social Studies of Science”. Apparently it has been accepted in the American Behavioral Scientist journal which is wonderful news for Siler, and thankfully he has been kind enough to put up an earlier draft on his personal webpage.

Regardless of some limitations (see my comments below), his quantitative data is interesting. It appears that, at the present time, more U.S. science and technology studies scholars are affiliated with (in the following order): (1) general academic/ interdisciplinary departments; (2) sociology departments; (3) science and technology studies departments; (4) history departments. 
Over the past year, I have had an eye on the job advertisements suitable for recent science and technology studies PhD graduates and there are several trends which correlate with Siler’s findings:

  1. The majority of "interdisciplinary social science" departments hiring science and technology studies scholars for tenure-track and lecturer positions for Fall 2012 are in smaller private technological universities: Illinois Institute of Technology, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Oregon Institute of Technology[1], and Stevens Institute of Technology. Alternatively, departments hiring science and technology studies scholars on tenure-track for Fall 2010 were in newly established (within the last 15 years) branches of large state universities, i.e. University of Washington-Bothell. I presume this is because these smaller technological universities and new state universities do not have the resources to establish what Siler calls “heartland” social science departments. Siler does point to the service function played by science and technology studies departments in technological universities such as Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Georgia Institute of Technology where heartland social science departments do not exist.
  2. A second trend of hires for Fall 2012, were contract-based lecturer positions in well-established undergraduate science, technology and society programs at comprehensive universities such as Stanford and University of Virginia or liberal arts universities such as Wesleyan University in Connecticut.
  3. A third trend of hires for Fall 2012, were tenure-track positions offered jointly by sociology departments and interdisciplinary studies departments, including: Sociology & Gender Studies at the University of Southern California; Sociology & African-American and African Studies at the University of Virginia. On page 30 of his article draft, Siler goes on to say that only 8.3% of the sociologists publishing in SSS are from the "Top 30" sociology departments in the U.S. (ranked according to U.S. News and World Report). This is seen in these two job announcements. While each of these two universities is prestigious on its own merits, their sociology departments are not ranked in the top 30 by U.S. News in 2009.
  4. Finally, I did not get a good sense of whether the post-doctorate positions advertised for science and technology studies scholars in the U.S. coalesced around specific department types or university types.
The limitation of Siler’s methodology for this particular paper is that he traces Science and Technology Studies as a field based on one journal (SSS) and twelve interviews. Siler points out that this is the de facto institutional journal for the field because of its longevity; the de jure institutional journal is Science, Technology and Human Values. STHV was formally established by the primary institutional body of the field, the Society for the Social Studies of Science. I argue that it has a different audience and slightly different aims and scope than SSS. It is my perception that STHV is predominantly oriented outwards to explain important contemporary issues on science and technology already being discussed in the social sciences using science and technology studies theory and concepts for a mixed science and technology studies and non-science and technology studies audience. Furthermore, I believe that SSS is predominantly oriented towards other scholars in the field and focuses on developing important empirical projects based on the canon of the field[2]. If my perception is correct, then tracing the development of the field based on SSS neglects some of the “entrepreneurial” strategies that are being employed by science and technology studies scholars publishing in STHV, Science as Culture and other journals. As an example, Science, Technology & Society is an internationally focused science and technology studies journal where they are attempting to demonstrate the importance of science and technology studies concepts and theory to world development.

Siler also seems to be using some sort of rational choice theory with which I am unfamiliar and cannot evaluate effectively. However, I am skeptical of any methodology which treats social relations as a zero-sum game.

That being said, there are obvious implications for science and technology studies scholars with recent PhDs who are looking for academic positions. The first being that, as science and technology studies does not have many tenure-track lines, it is important to be able to shape your teaching and research portfolio to fit either interdisciplinary departments with their unique aims and objectives, or heartland departments in history or sociology where you might provide an additional strength to their program.

The second implication is that science and technology studies scholars will not necessarily find academic positions in institutions similar to the elite research-intensive universities in which they were trained. It is possible that search committees have something of a “buyer’s market”. In the current job climate, search committees at research-intensive universities, liberal arts colleges, and community colleges have the ability to select from many accomplished recent Ph.D. graduates and post-doctoral associates with excellent teaching and research credentials for tenure-track and non-tenure-track jobs.

The professional higher education articles also discuss the need to orient Ph.D. students towards non-academic positions earlier in their career planning process (i.e. the second semester instead of the second-to-last semester of graduate school). Taking a second look at the many articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education or Inside Higher Ed that discuss the overproduction of humanities and social science Ph.D.s for academic positions, one finds that humanities and social science graduate students, similar to graduate students in science and engineering, are an exploitable source of labor for the university. Similar to science and engineering, post-doctoral fellowships after the humanities or social science Ph.D. are becoming more and more common after writing the dissertation. It is less likely that a humanities or social science Ph.D. student who is not graduating from an elite university will get a tenure-track academic position. Burris notes, that in field of sociology “[g]raduates from the top 5 departments account for roughly one-third of all faculty hired in all 94 departments. The top 20 departments account for roughly 70 percent of the total”.[3] Extrapolating from this data, if elite sociology departments tend to circulate their own PhD graduates for job searches, and less-elite sociology departments tend to hire PhD students from elite sociology departments, where does that leave junior STS scholars (like myself) who are interested in joining sociology departments? As Siler notes, STS scholars tend to reside in less elite sociology departments. How will such scholars convince their department's search committee to hire an interdisciplinary person such as an STS scholar from an elite research-intensive university? It is more likely that the less elite sociology department will hire a recently graduated sociologist from an elite sociology department.

Therefore, depending upon a junior STS scholar's interests, it might also be useful to consider non-academic positions. I personally like the idea of conducting informational interviews in order to navigate the confusing variety of non-academic positions in museums, policy institutes, international development organizations, U.S. federal government, member associations, technology companies, etc.

One person I might ask about careers in the federal government would be Jennifer Tucker. Dr. Tucker received her Ph.D. in science and technology studies from Virginia Polytechnic Institute.  She worked as a consultant for a while before joining the U.S. Department of Agriculture as the Associate Deputy Administrator of the National Organic Food Program. We are privileged to have her as a career panelist at the “International Context for Science and Technology Policy” Gordon Research Seminar from August 4-5, 2012. Another person I might ask would be Pauline Kusiak. She received her Ph.D. in science and technology studies from Cornell University and since 2008 has worked for the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Policy Planning (U.S. Department of Defense).

I am not sure who I would ask about careers for social scientists in technology companies. For example, I know that Assistant Professor Jenna Burrell worked for Intel in the “Peoples and Practices” group before going into a graduate program in sociology at the London School of Economics. What did she do at Intel?  That would definitely be interesting to find out in an informational interview. Especially as Silicon Valley needs more humanities Ph.D’s, right?

Any suggestions of STS scholars whom I might interview about careers in policy institutes, member associations and museums?

[1] Actually Oregon Tech and NJIT are public institutions.

[2] This understanding of the roles of STHV and SSS is gained by (1) reading articles from both journals; (2) conversation with other science and technology studies scholars in my department and other departments; (3) the science and technology studies +20 workshop organized by Sheila Jasanoff at the Harvard Kennedy School, where several speakers, including previous editors, provided information and statistics about both journals.

[3] Burris, Val. 2004. “The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in Ph.D. Exchange Networks”. American Sociological Review.69:239-264

6 Comments
Yujia He
29/5/2012 11:20:45 am

Hi Logan,

I just found your blog randomly and enjoyed reading your posts. I know of a recent CMU doctorate in EPP who is now working as a consultant for McKinsey. So I would assume you can look at consulting agencies for private sector interviewees. Microsoft also has a technology policy group (http://www.hpcdan.org/about.html) that regularly hires interns.

As for policy institutes, Resources for the Future hires interns and full-time researchers. For museums, I know a friend who got an unpaid internship offer at the Smithonian so the Smithonians may be taking in people as well.

Reply
Logan Williams link
29/5/2012 11:14:54 pm

Hey Yujia,

Thanks for these references, they are really helpful!

Logan

Reply
Jennifer Tucker link
2/6/2012 02:12:27 pm

Hi Logan! Thanks for mentioning me in your blog - I am more than happy to do informational interviews with STS students interested in talking about careers in the Federal government (also happy to talk about consulting, too). I can be reached at jtucker@tuckertalk.net. - Jenny

Reply
Logan Williams link
3/6/2012 09:06:37 pm

Jenny, that is great, thanks!
Logan

Reply
Casey O'Donnell link
4/6/2012 07:30:22 am

A good number of us have been finding homes in "communications" departments in very traditional research academic roles. From RPI alone, I'd index Sean Lawson, Hector Postigo, and myself. I've seen other STS scholars from other programs make similar steps. Those are often because of empirical overlaps rather than anything particularly "STS."

Reply
Logan Williams link
4/6/2012 05:44:17 pm

Hi Casey -- Thanks for the insight. I will definitely contact Sean and Hector about tenure-track jobs, that is a good idea. :) Logan

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Logan primarily uses this blog to: reflect on policy and professionalization issues in STS (e.g. research funding, discipline formation, skill building, job-hunting, policy applications of STS theory) and to disseminate her own scholarship.


    Archives

    June 2017
    June 2015
    September 2013
    July 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    July 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    February 2012
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    August 2010

    Categories

    All
    4s
    Adapt Science And Technology
    Agra-Alliance
    Arguing Better
    Asa
    ASA-SKAT
    Blogging
    Call For Papers
    Caorc Multi Country Fellowship
    CAORC Multi-country Fellowship
    Cleveland Oh
    Conference
    Coordination
    Creativity
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cwwl Graduate Fellowship
    Dialogue
    Dublin
    Engagement
    Engineering Co-op
    Engineers
    Environment
    Environmental Economic Social Sustainability
    Environmental-Economic-Social Sustainability
    Federal Funding
    Gigiri Nairobi Kenya
    Gordon Research Seminar
    Graduate Programs In Sts
    Graduate Students
    Health
    Ibm
    India
    Information And Communications Technologies
    Innovation
    Institutions
    International
    Ireland
    Junior Professionals
    Kathmandu Nepal
    Kenya
    Knowledge From The Margins
    Laico Internship
    Learning As Process
    Local Global
    Local-global
    Low Income Communities
    Low-income Communities
    Madurai India
    Media Arts
    Mexico City Mexico
    Middle School
    National Science Foundation
    Natural Scientists
    Nepal
    New Delhi India
    New Haven Connecticut
    Open Spaces
    Periphery-center
    Planning
    Point Of View
    Policy Makers
    Policy-makers
    Post Docs
    Post-docs
    Poverty
    Publication
    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    Rpi
    Science And Technology Policy
    Science And Technology Studies
    Science From Below
    Sleeping
    Social Scientists
    Socoiology
    Sts
    Survey
    Teaching As Process
    Terminal 3
    Top Universities In The World
    Travel
    Triple Bottom Line
    Triple Helix
    Unep Internship
    Urban Development
    User As Producer
    U.S. House Of Representatives Committee On Appropriations
    Woods Hole Massachusetts
    Workshop
    Writing Faster
    Yale University

    Contributor For

    CWWL Graduate Fellows
    Passage International

    Academic Professionalism Blogs

    Get a Life, PhD
    Female Science Professor
    Savage Minds

    Women, Minorities & K-12 STEM Blogs

    RIFE
    Schooling Science
    3Helix

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
✕